Archive for the 'BAD DESIGN' Category

LinkedIn, Facebook-broken by design

When you sign up for a social network, please don’t let the “find your friends here” or “invite your friends to join” web applications have your email address book. Unless your a spamer or stalker. Because you’ll tee off someone like me. And I’ll get you thrown off the social network, and gloat about it on my blog.

The problem is, the emails they hound your friends with have no way for your friends to either opt out of the invitation or of being notified. Often the only way to stop being hounded is too join the social network, and friend the a*hole who spamed you. Broken by design.

BUT if you can get through to the social network, just telling them that the person who spamed you is a child molester or a nigerian scammer will get them removed from the site. And stop the email invites from them.

It’s been a great day so far, but I’m thinking about just getting everyone who’s last name starts with C booted from LinkedIn. Next week I’ll work on Facebook.

Cellphone Hell

I just received an email from my cellphone company that the “free” phone i ordered and paid for to replace my malfunctioning one is sold out. They will credit my account. But since I already re-upped my contract to get the discount on this phone, I’m no longer eligible for the discounted/free phones. I am going to have to waste time dealing with this tomorrow. Can anyone loan me a phone so I can call my cellphone company?

One thought on Steve Jobs sick leave…

Maybe now the iPhone and iPod Touch will get copy and paste.

Why the new Macbooks suck

One reason why they the new MacBooks suck, other then their name which I still think blows, is the lack of Firewire. This is chiefly necessary if you own a video camera, it’s how 95% of them upload the video to your computer for editing and DVD making. But it’s also necessary for target mode, which essentially turns your entire laptop into a hard drive. Pretty geeky? No, absolutely necessary, something Intel and M$ should have copied. Consider what happened to me last night.

Leaving out the backstory, I had to fix two dead laptops armed only with a OS X install DVD and a Firewire cable. That was it, not even my geek tool. Neither laptop would boot, the G4 iBook had a known bad CD drive, so I couldn’t boot off the instal DVD. I did however boot the G4 PowerBook off it. Running the disk utility couldn’t repair the hard drive-mechanical issues. But i was able to get the iBook into target mode, hook it to the PowerBook booted off the install DVD and run the disk utility, which resolved it’s problems for the moment (it would still need to be backed up, reformatted, and reinstalled).

Had the iBook been a MacBook with a dead optical drive, I wouldn’t have been able to get it going last night. Not without more equipment. I’d have need an external USB hard drive pre loaded with OS X, or one of those pricey emergency boot tool USB flash drives. Come to think of it, that’s a scenario I’m going to have to cover. Thank you Apple, more crap to carry in the 55lb pack of doom.

So that’s one reason the new MacBooks suck, they’re harder to fix at the Laundromat with just the stuff in your pockets.

Every thing changes but Windows still sucks

So I’m still borrowing and begging computers to get online.

They’re all PCs running Windows.

They all suck. You should never see your computer re-render the screen. You should never see your computer missrender a portion of your screen. No should your computer force you to reboot to get back online. When a Mac does any of that, it’s a sure sign that Something Very Bad has happened, something that will involve you having to fix your Mac.

With Windows it’s an hourly event.

As bad as Leopard is, I’ve slighted it by comparing it to Vista. Vista is like bathing in fecal matter. Leopard’s annoyances are only because of the high standards set by Tiger (and yes, even Tiger had room for improvement).

The big problems for both operating systems are trying to build on top of an already bloated and creaky codebase. Apple would be wise to listen to it’s developers in this regard. There’s a lot of stuff under the hood that needs fixing. Microsoft ofcourse has listened to it’s users, and felt their pain. That’s why they’re buying Yahoo and moving into advertising. Even they don’t want to use their own software anymore.

OS X Leopard is Vista, Pt. 1

Any Operating System update that forces me to change my current workflow against my wishes, BECAUSE IT IS INCAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE ACTIONS THE PREVIOUS VERSION WAS CAPABLE OF IS A FAILURE. Even if the workflow just involved keeping 60 tabs open in Firefox. likewise if it forces me to turn off features that have been there since day one. Or not use some/any/all the new features for fear of  bogging/crashing my machine. Extra special failure points for random irreproducible system lock ups without the spinning beach ball of doom and random miss-writing of the screen (honestly, that’s something that hasn’t happened to me since i quit using Windows 98).

Seedy details

I was reading Daringfireball this morning and came across a link to a one day design conference, SEED

So I follow the link, and find out it’s happening at IIT, in the Koolhaas. And I keep reading and trip over this nugget:

In fact, the CTA Orange Line runs right through the Campus Center. Directions. Google Map.

Well, actually, no. Th Orange line barely passes within a mile of campus. The Red Line goes down one side of it, and the Green goes right through it, and right through the Koolhaas. Here’s the CTA map if you don’t believe me.  Considering that some of the people responsible for this conference are right here in town, I can only assume they’re not public transit takers (ah, but who is these days, except for the poor and the sports fans?). Or maybe being designers they were thrown off by the color of parts of the Koolhaas? I dunno, but I wonder how many out of towners are going to be lost on the Orange line?

(BTW, it’s a perfectly safe train ride now that they’ve begun demolishing the projects near the  campus. Really. And Please follow the link to the conference to see how poorly executed the Koolhaas is, like most modern architecture it looks best 500 feet away at 50MPH, up close it really looks filthy,seedy and sloppy.)

MOLLE II follow up review

The MOLLE II (hence fourth just MOLLE) backpack I use which is army issue is killing me. It’s damn near impossible to balance, adjust, maneuver with, enter transport while wearing, load, put on, stow, remove and find anything in. I snag on doors, public transit turnstiles and trains. I can just barely get on a bus with it, some of the older buses are ordeals. And I only have one sustainment pouch, if I had both I’d have to get on sideways, or use the wheel chair gate at the train station! The lids for each bag just suck. The main ruck’s simple flap won’t adequately cover the top opening if you have the bag stuffed out to the top, let alone if you have the internal rain collar stuffed full edge to edge. The more fitted lid on the sleep carrier won’t cover properly if you have the carrier stuffed out either, and slides around when it’s under loaded. Walking or riding a bike is plain dangerous, with the whole MOLLE or just the load shifting. Having to tighten the straps holding the shoulder straps and hip belt on three times a day is maddening. Having to remove the shoulder straps and hip belt to adjust it is maddening. Getting them centered is almost impossible. Strap management is a nightmare, the manual says to use tape, which I quickly found out turns the bag into a sticky mess in hot weather. And it would mean carrying a roll of tape since i change my load so often (ITW web Dominators are the preferred solution, but I can’t afford them). The hip belt buckle broke, making proper adjustment impossible. Until I find another 2″ buckle the whole rig rides on my ass, which is increasing my discomfort and adding to my extent back pain, and hence to my insomnia.

The tripartite system-frame and dual bag is inefficient and adds weight. Whether your storing your sleeping bag or your clothes in the sleep carrier it makes the MOLLE top heavy and impossible to stand up on it’s own. This makes it harder to load and access things in the main rucksack. You have to lay the MOLLE on the ground to access anything in the sleep carrier bag. Since there is two bags, you have the added weight of two rain collars (neither of which are water proof). You have the added weight of attachment systems and two flaps and associated webbing. The whole thing ends up bigger then it needs to be, and ungainly. More importantly for it’s intended use, more so then mine, if the frame breaks there is no easy way to use the shoulder straps and hip belt with the main ruck alone, you could hack them together but it would be a real kludge. And ride much higher on your back. then there is the relative lack of PALS webbing for pouch attachment, and the poor choice of outer pocket placement.

In short it’s way to modular the wrong ways, not modular enough in the right ways, fiddly in and in constant need of adjustment (the manual says it’s a 2 person job too). It’s way to easy to set up wrong. And as the webbing wear and stretch it becomes harder, and needs adjustment more often. This despite my not carrying the load the Army reports most soldiers carrying in the field.

This isn’t just any pissy civilan whining: I wear this rig 8 plus hours a day, and walk miles in it. And I grew up on surplus, for both cost factors and because if it was made to survive combat it would survive me. I carried my books and cameras in WW2 backpacks and surplus haversacks from elementary school until adulthood when I could afford Domke bags and Timbuk2. I’m also not biased against external frame backpacks, My camping rig until the late eighties was built around a external frame melded onto a succession of surplus haversacks. Eventually the frame died, (it took 15 years) and I got a Jansport backpack. After a camping trip in the early nineties with Ben showed the Jansport to be too small for anything other then everyday carry, I went back to surplus. I got a large ALICE pack with the steel frame. I served me well for years, hell, I moved into an apartment using it and public transport.

(I should also point out that I am fat enough that the straps barely go around me. This shouldn’t effect balance or adjustment though.)

Now granted this is a MOLLE II rig. There have been constant improvements to the frame, it’s now on it’s fourth generation. It’s stronger and much more flexible, so your body doesn’t work against it as much when it’s properly adjusted.The one i handled seamed lighter then my generation 2 frame. And I don’t have the new large ruck, which has much more PALS webbing. It’s also much larger, because it integrates the sleep carrier for a one bag solution. But this photo says it all. It shows the CEO of Down East Inc wearing the current MOLLE rig with their 4th generation frame and new large ruck. It was meant to show off a compression strap rig they made to mount heavy objects to the system, but it shows the bag canting (look at the rows of horizontal PALS webbing on the ruck and his left side).

For the time being I’m still going to have to use it. I’m going to try and get the surplus bergen pack listed in the sidebar. And hope I win the lottery so I can buy a Kifaru.

Older computers more responsive then new?

One of my pet peeves for years has been that that my father’s now ancient 266mhz Pentium II running Windows 95 feels more responsive then a modern 2400+mhz machine running a modern operating system, and that my recollections of running NextStep on 30mhz Black Hardware was even more responsive. A lot of fanboys still maintain that OS 9 is faster then the current version of OS X on the same hardware (my experience was the opposite back when I still had hardware to run OS 9, but then my hardware had a half speed system bus). I’ve blustered this out to various nerds  and engineers and got a pat on the head and a mute comment about the rise of 3d video cards displacing the 2d cards which made a computer seem responsive.

Bullshit. We have a real problem here, not just Windows and OS X, but Linux as well. Bloat and multiple layers of add ons have ruined responsiveness.

Don’t believe me? Here’s a shoot out between a Mac Plus running System 6.0.8 versus an AMD dual core running XP. The Mac wins.  8mhz and 4 megs of ram versus 2400+mhz and 1gig of ram. Yes, XP has more features, yes, 6.0.8 was written in assembler. But it’s the user experiance that’s went down hill. Please note: this is a shoot out with XP, Vista is even slower then XP on the same hardware. Still don’t believe me? Check out this video of a much younger Steve Jobs demoing NextStep 3.0.

Remember that computers were billed as the ultimate in labor saving devices? I don’t particularly care if Redmond gets the message, but I do care about OS X and Linux. It would be a colossal embarrassment if Leopard shipped as slow as Vista. It’s time for a ground up redesign, or time at least to think about new architectures.  The time we save may be our own.

The Chicago Sun-Times redesign

Anyone notice how the new Chicago Sun-Times design looks exactly like mid 90′s Iomega ads? Each featured column features your basic high key shot of the author standing and looking up at the camera, shot from the top of a ladder with a fisheye lens to get massive perspective distortion. Or how it maximizes white space at the cost of content (and advertising)? Apparently no one other there remembers that newspaper design is supposed to enhance readability, not produce lots of white space around illegible puddles of poorly printed content(it is a newspaper after all, not a E! Hollywood exclusive report on the columnists). And they forgot the Stephen King law: the size of the authors byline and photo on the mast head or book cover is inversly proportional to the quality of the work (the biggerr the name the shittier the book).  Or that people feel ripped off buying white space. Oh well. Pretty soon this is going to be a one newspaper town, judging by the redesign.




Subscribe to FFEJWORLD! (RSS feeds)

Help Support the Site!

Amazon will no longer affiliate with anyone in Illinois-there goes 38 bucks a year of my livelihood!